Welcome, 77 artists, 40 different points of Attica welcomes you by singing Erotokritos an epic romance written at 1713 by Vitsentzos Kornaros
Friday, September 27, 2013
Greek Food Fest kicks off today! Opa!
Parish Whistleblower Chief Removed by Church
Why the West Plunders Greece
Parish council chief ousted after seeking suspension of priest
How racially diverse is Auburn's Greek system? 'We can do better,' official says
Ban order placed on Syntagma march by Greek army reservists
More Scandinavian tourists to Crete, Rhodes this fall
Court deems law on illegal buildings unconstitutional
Economic sentiment in Greece improved in September
Venizelos talks Cyprus, name row with Kerry in US
Samaras to meet with IMF chief in Washington
Pope Francis Meets with Syrian Greek-Orthodox Patriarch
Greece plans capital boost of over 1 billion euros for Eurobank: source
One Hyde Park: a good address, but one doesn't actually live there
Costing up to £100m, most of the Knightsbridge apartments are sold but unoccupied, distorting London's housing market
It is billed as the "most exclusive address in the world", but One Hyde Park is apparently not the main one used by more than three-quarters of those who own homes there, according to information released by Westminster council.
The Candy brothers' luxury development in the London borough of Knightsbridge has more than 80 apartments, but only 19 are registered as "occupied by individuals" for council tax purposes, it has emerged, following a freedom of information request by the magazine Inside Housing.
Of the rest of the properties, which were marketed at £6m for a one-bedroom flat to £100m-plus for a penthouse, the council treats 16 as empty and 26 as second homes. The remaining 23 are registered as occupied by companies.
Many of the flats are known to have been sold to overseas buyers, including wealthy individuals from Asia, the Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Greece and Canada, and it has previously been revealed that 80% were bought through offshore entities, the majority registered in the British Virgin Islands.
The information gives more insight into how many are actually being lived in. Residential properties owned through companies are still required to pay council tax, and since April the council has not offered a discount for second homes or those that lie empty. Owners who do not use them will still be paying the full amount each year, currently £1,361.
David Ireland, chief executive of the campaign group Empty Homes, said the figures illustrated the oddness of the prime London housing market, and how headline figures about the number of homes being built did not tell the whole story.
"These flats are being used as a kind of tradeable currency for the international super-rich. On one level, it's flattering that London is valued so highly by overseas buyers, but I fear the cost is felt by ordinary Londoners as these prices feed down the housing market," he said. "These flats will have counted towards the statistics, but are about as relevant to housing need as uneaten caviar and truffles are to the starving."
PropertyHouse pricesHousing marketReal estateHomesLondonHilary Osbornetheguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More FeedsBenchmark for Greek stocks racks up five days of gains
Train travel time between Larissa and Volos to get shorter
Police release statistics on crime around Greece
Appeal by Greece's ERT employees against closure goes to court
Greek prosecutor to investigate university protest closures
Acropolis Rally dropped from WRC calendar for 2014
Polly Panou Passes Away
EYP Removes Golden Dawn Investigating Officer
Greek life: Opinions through the years
Greece: Time to Wake Up!
Greece orders wiretap on neo-Nazis amid violence
Greek police ban rally by reservist special forces who had called for resignation of gov't
Greek Police Ban Rally by Commando Reservists
Gold mine hits rich seam of Greek red tape
The Cleaning of Asopos River Begins
EU Subsidies To Greece Will Pour In
Loans and Deposits Reduced in August 2013
Troika Talks Break Down Again
Attack on Kedikoglou’s Brother’s House Averted
Europe's top human rights body urges Turkey to pay damages to relatives of Cyprus missing
Logothetis Family Powerhouse Summit
Turkey Urged To Pay For Missing Cypriots
Cyprus' Benefactors Lift The Room
Recovery hype: American capitalism's weapon of mass distraction
You don't have to be a Marxist to see how the 1% tries to fool us that we too are sharing in their renewed wealth. But it helps
From President Obama on down, defenders of the status quo insist that the US economy has "recovered" or "is recovering". Some actually see the world that way. They inhabit, imagine they inhabit, or plan to soon inhabit the world of the infamous top 1%. Others simply seek security in life by loyally repeating whatever that 1% is saying.
Here is the "recovery" that they see. The top 1% of income-earners in the US took 19% of the national income in 2012, the largest share since 1928. That 1% also saw their average income rise by 31.4% from the current crisis's low point in 2009, through 2012. The top 1% certainly enjoyed a recovery.
In total contrast, income for the other 99% rose by an average of 0.4% during the same period. Many of those people actually saw their earnings drop. That was not a recovery, not even close. For the vast majority of Americans, the recovery hype is just a weapon of mass distraction.
The economic reality is driven home by this graph from the Wall Street Journal.
From 2007 – the last year before the current recession hit – until now, the median income of Americans has dropped by nearly 10% with no recovery evident.
Yes, the stock markets and profits for large banks and corporations have recovered, more or less. That explains the good fortune of the top 1%. Their incomes depend heavily on the health of those parts of the economy (especially interest, dividends, and capital gains).
But the 99% depend mostly on wages and salaries. High unemployment keeps their income hobbled, as does the persistent shift in the US from jobs with high pay and good benefits to jobs with neither.
Hyping a recovery helps politicians to boost their popularity (or at least, slow its decline). It also serves to give masses of people with growing economic difficulties the impression that "other people" are experiencing a recovery. So they blame themselves (their age, skill set, education and so on) for missing out. The recovery hype thereby functions as a massive "blame-the-victim" program, in which a dysfunctional capitalism escapes criticism, while its victims instead turn criticism inward upon themselves.
Hyping recovery pleases those seeking reassurance about the state of capitalism. They want to hear that it is – or will shortly be – the secure, near-perfect economic system they always thought and said it was. They want to see the system's flaws, imperfections, and ongoing crisis – stressed by capitalism's critics – as merely minor and passing irritations. Calming references to recovery – used often and said as authoritatively as possible – nicely suggest that capitalism is either healing itself or being healed by a benevolent government.
Academic economists, with careers built celebrating capitalism's efficiency, growth, and optimality for everyone, need urgently to hype recovery just as they have long hyped capitalism. They want to escape the ridicule of agitated students who keep taking on more crushing debt to pay for school, while their job and income prospects deteriorate.
These students turn a critical eye toward the economic system and quickly discover the rich and diverse literature of criticism of capitalism. Why, they increasingly demand, have their teachers never taught them about all that? Mainstream economics professors fear the exposure of their longstanding intolerant exclusion of most strong critics of capitalism from teaching and research opportunities. Students are beginning to demand the open, balanced education long denied them. They want to hear and read the academic critics alongside the academic celebrants of capitalism; they want to decide for themselves which perspective – or combination of perspectives – to use and develop.
Hyping recovery is also supported from darker, more cynical motives. Leaders of large corporations who have already moved many of their operations out of the US call the current situation a "mature" economy. This euphemism reflects their sense that rapid growth now happens more outside the US than inside and, therefore, higher profits beckon overseas where wages and taxes are lower. They want to keep freely relocating over the coming years with minimal opposition as they depart.
The leaders of these companies especially prefer to be less heavily invested here when the American working class is realizing that the capitalism that raised their wages across earlier decades of growth is fast departing for more profitable opportunities abroad. That departure abandons the American working class to steady decline – as countless indicators show: falling real wages, reduced public services, high unemployment, etc.
Business leaders and their elected friends fear workers' rage and resentment, should they be able to identify who and what did them in. Hyping recovery provides "delaying cover" as businesses executives relocate their facilities abroad, their homes and offices inside "gated communities", and their workplaces into "heavily secured enterprise zones".
Many mass media corporations render the service of hyping the recovery eagerly to their advertisers. These advertisers wish to avoid association with bad news that might distress audiences. The mainstream media therefore offers up infotainment with economic recovery "highlights". They also emphasize reports about countries whose experiences with the global economic crisis are worse than that of the US.
For example, immense attention focuses on Greece and Spain, rather than Germany or Sweden. The crisis has been far, far less damaging in the latter than in the former or in the US. Likewise, when the mass media here cover the high unemployment rates in certain European countries, they often conveniently omit that unemployment there does not affect citizens' health insurance coverage, pensions, or most public services and subsidies as negatively as it does in the US.
The recovery hype performs the same service of mass distraction in this crisis as the accumulation of consumer debt provided since the 1970s. From the 1970s to the economic collapse in 2008, household debt accumulation distracted American workers from the stagnation of their real wages. As the requisite accumulation demanded by the American dream slipped increasingly out of reach of wages and salaries, it was acquired instead through borrowing. Eventually, rising household debt levels could no longer be sustained by wages and salaries that had stopped rising.
Crisis ensued. Since 2009, the recovery hype has replaced debt accumulation as the chief distraction, sustaining the illusion that capitalism adequately serves the 99%.
US economyUnited StatesUS economic growth and recessionUS unemployment and employment dataEqualityEconomicsRichard Wolfftheguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More FeedsGolden Dawn's neo-Nazis: A murder too far in Greece
Opa!'s Greek cuisine shines in new Oakbrook Terrace location
Golden Dawn sue PASOK for financial wrongdoing
Tax evasion: how much does it cost?
Lionel Messi is in court over allegations of fraud totalling over £3.4m. What's the bigger picture on tax evasion? How much does the Spanish government lose each year and how do other countries compare?
The trial of Barcelona footballer Lionel Messi on charges of tax fraud has come at a time when Spanish government coffers are running particularly low. Which makes it all the more contentious that tax evasion cost Spain €80bn (£67bn) in a single year. But that seems small fry compared to the estimated $337bn the US treasury lost out on.
The numbers, taken from World Bank estimates on the size of each country's shadow economy, are fascinating – even if not perfectly reliable. Counting any type of illicit behaviour is always prone to error and black market activity is no exception.
Europe has the world's biggest black marketWhen different regions are compared, Europe comes out the worst in terms of the size of its black market and the total amount of tax it loses as a result.
As a region though, Europe also has the highest tax rates in the world. Out of 36 countries looked at, Europeans averaged a tax rate that was 39% of their GDP, compared to a world average of 28%. The lowest rates were found among 39 African countries which had taxes that represented around 17% of their GDP.
Ten biggest countriesIn 2010, the latest year that data was available, ten governments in the world lost out on $100bn each (£62bn). Unfortunately, using the total amount of tax lost as the basis for comparison means that interesting case studies like Greece are left out - even if their shadow markets would represent a big chunk of their GDP.
We ranked the biggest ten according to three different measures:1. Total size of the shadow economy2. Tax lost as a result of the shadow economy3. Tax lost as a % of GDP
The US has the world's biggest shadow economy and loses the most tax as a result. But, when looked at as a % of GDP, Russia suffers most as a result of tax evasion - the lost money represents 15% of the country's economic output. You can see how each country compares by clicking on the different options in the chart below.
Switching your view to 'tax lost as a % of GDP' means that the allegations against Messi take on a different dimension - Spain rockets up from 9th to 4th place.
Sick sumsThe Tax Justice Network have estimates for every country in the world in a report they published in November 2011. The research specifically focuses on the way that tax evasion affects health care spending. In Bolivia, they found that tax evasion represents 419% of the government's spend on healthcare while in Russia it was 311% making them the top 2 'tax evasion losers'.
What is a shadow economy?Is a black market really a good reflection of the black hole tax evasion creates? Here's the definition that the World Bank's researchers used so you can decide for yourself:
All market-based legal production of goods and services that are deliberately concealed from public authorities for any of the following reasons:1. to avoid payment of income. value added or other taxes,2. to avoid payment of social security contributions,3. to avoid having to meet certain legal labour market standards, such as minimum wages, minimum working hours, safety standards, etc and4. to avoid complying with certain administrative procedures, such as completing statistical questionnaires or other administrative forms
Does any of this data surprise you? Do you think tax evasion is unavoidable? Share you views here...
Get the numbers and get involved• Download the full spreadsheet• Contact us at data@theguardian.com• Follow us on Twitter• Like us on Facebook
SpainLionel MessiTax avoidanceTax and spendingRussiaEuropeBoliviaBrazilItalyMona Chalabitheguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds